The sovereign alternative to US AI platforms
Most 'German' and 'European' AI platforms are Azure/OpenAI front-ends with a US parent. Here's what actually differs — factual and verifiable.
'GDPR-compliant' is not the same as sovereign
GDPR compliance describes HOW data is processed. Sovereignty describes WHO owns the processing and which law the provider is subject to. A provider can be GDPR-compliant — and still belong to a US corporation subject to the CLOUD Act. That is exactly the gap we close.
The comparison in detail
Why it matters
Staying honest: our own US opt-in
We hide nothing: on explicit request, an organization can enable US frontier models (GPT, Claude) — logged, owner-only, never in auto mode and never by default. The default is 100% EU; US models are a deliberate, documented decision by your organization.
Comparison FAQ
Is not 'GDPR-compliant' enough?
For data processing, yes — for jurisdiction, no. GDPR-compliant does not mean the provider is beyond the reach of the US CLOUD Act. Sovereignty goes beyond GDPR: provider, ownership and law must be European.
What about ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot?
Both are US services under US law — even in 'EU' variants. For sovereignty-sensitive data they are no substitute for an EU provider with EU models and an EU structure.
Is not an 'EU region' the same as an EU provider?
No. An EU region is a server location. The provider — and its parent company — can still be American and therefore bound by US law. We are an EU provider ourselves, not just EU-hosted.
Can I still use GPT or Claude with you?
Yes, optionally. Your organization can explicitly enable US frontier models — logged and never by default. The EU path stays the default; the choice is deliberately yours.
Ready to bring your AI infrastructure to Europe?
Up and running in minutes — 14-day free trial, no credit card.
We are launching soon — secure one of the first spots.

